Which of the following would be an effective type of deterrence of overt crimes?

The effectiveness of visibility as a deterrent for overt crimes hinges on the principle that potential offenders are less likely to commit a crime if they feel they can be easily seen. High visibility in an environment can create the perception of being monitored, thereby making criminals think twice before acting. This concept is anchored in the theory of crime prevention through environmental design, which suggests that altering the physical environment can reduce opportunities for crime.

Visibility can be achieved through various means, such as well-lit areas, open layouts, and the presence of bystanders. A space that is busy and populated sends a message that there are people around who could witness any illicit activity, thereby discouraging would-be offenders.

While surveillance cameras and employee training play important roles in a comprehensive security strategy, their impact is often predicated on the presence of visible deterrents. Cameras can capture crimes after they occur, and training can help employees respond to incidents, but visibility directly affects the willingness of offenders to engage in criminal behavior in the first place. Market analysis, while useful for understanding crime trends or high-risk areas, does not actively deter crime in the same immediate manner as visibility does.