What type of liability can a security officer incur when they fail to act responsibly?

A security officer can incur liability through negligence when they fail to act responsibly. Negligence arises when a person fails to exercise a reasonable standard of care that a typical person would in a similar situation, leading to harm to others. In the context of a security officer's role, this can include failing to properly monitor premises, not responding to incidents appropriately, or neglecting to follow established protocols that are designed to ensure safety.

This type of liability emphasizes the officer's duty to protect individuals and property while on the job. If their inaction results in damage, injury, or loss, the officer may be held accountable under negligence laws. The focus is on the officer's conduct and whether it fell below the expected standard of care.

In contrast, other types of liability mentioned, like civil or criminal, refer to different legal frameworks and considerations. Civil liability often encompasses a broader range of actions, not solely hinging on the failure to act responsibly, while criminal liability involves violations of the law that can lead to prosecution. Vicarious liability pertains to the responsibility of an employer for the actions of their employees, which is separate from an individual officer's personal negligence.